Application of the Deffuant Model in Money Exchange

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26713/cma.v16i4.3124

Keywords:

Equal wealth, Social mobility, Money transfer, The rich and poor, Conservative system, Social network

Abstract

A money transfer system involves interactions between buyers and sellers, where a buyer purchases goods or services from a seller. The amount of money lost by the buyer is exactly equal to the amount gained by the seller. Over time, these transactions accumulate, influencing the overall distribution of wealth within the system. At each time step, a randomly chosen pair of socially connected agents interacts through a financial transaction, following predefined exchange rules. We extend the Deffuant opinion dynamics model to formulate a money exchange system, where interactions between agents determine the redistribution of wealth. Through this framework, we investigate the conditions under which asymptotic stability emerges, ensuring that the system reaches a steady state. Additionally, we explore whether and when an equal wealth distribution can be achieved under different interaction dynamics. By incorporating elements of social connectivity and iterative financial exchanges, our study provides insights into how simple micro-level interactions can lead to macroscopic patterns of wealth distribution. The findings contribute to the broader understanding of economic dynamics, wealth inequality, and social influence on financial transactions. This study bridges the gap between opinion dynamics and wealth exchange models, offering a novel perspective on financial stability in social systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

V. D. Blondel, J. M. Hendrickx and J. N. Tsitsiklis, On Krause’s multi-agent consensus model with state-dependent connectivity, IEEE transactions on Automatic Control 54(11) (2009), 2586 – 2597, DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2009.2031211.

A. Chakraborti and B. K. Chakrabarti, Statistical mechanics of money: How saving propensity affects its distribution, The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 17 (2000), 167 – 170, DOI: 10.1007/s100510070173.

G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard and G. Weisbuch, Mixing beliefs among interacting agents, Advances in Complex Systems 3 (2000), 87 – 98, DOI: 10.1142/S0219525900000078.

A. Dragulescu and V. M. Yakovenko, Statistical mechanics of money, The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 17 (2000), 723 – 729, DOI: 10.1007/s100510070114.

W. Han, C. Huang and J. Yang, Opinion clusters in a modified Hegselmann–Krause model with heterogeneous bounded confidences and stubbornness, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 531 (2019), 121791, DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.121791.

N. Kiyotaki and R. Wright, A search-theoretic approach to monetary economics, The American Economic Review 83(1) (1993), 63 – 77, www.jstor.org/stable/2117496.

M. Lallouache, A. S. Chakrabarti, A. Chakraborti and B. K. Chakrabarti, Opinion formation in kinetic exchange models: Spontaneous symmetry-breaking transition, Physical Review E 82 (2010), 056112, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.82.056112.

H.-L. Li, Leader–follower dynamics: Stability and consensus in a socially structured population, AIMS Mathematics 10(2) (2025), 3652 – 3671, DOI: 10.3934/math.2025169.

H.-L. Li, Mixed Hegselmann-Krause dynamics II, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B 28(5) (2023), 2981 – 2993, DOI: 10.3934/dcdsb.2022200.

J. Lorenz, Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: A survey, International Journal of Modern Physics C 18(12) (2007), 1819 – 1838, DOI: 10.1142/S0129183107011789.

M. Molico, The distribution of money and prices in search equilibrium, International Economic Review 47(3) (2006), 701 – 722, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2006.00393.x.

A. V. Proskurnikov and R. Tempo, A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part I, Annual Reviews in Control 43 (2017), 65 – 79, DOI: 10.1016/j.Arcontrol.2017.03.002.

Y. Shang, Deffuant model of opinion formation in one-dimensional multiplex networks, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 48 (2015), 395101, DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/48/39/395101.

Y. Shang, Deffuant model with general opinion distributions: First impression and critical confidence bound, Complexity 19(2) (2013), 38 – 49, DOI: 10.1002/cplx.21465.

V. M. Yakovenko and J. B. Rosser Jr., Colloquium: Statistical mechanics of money, wealth, and income, Reviews of Modern Physics 81 (2009), 1703 – 1725, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1703.

Downloads

Published

30-12-2025
CITATION

How to Cite

Li, H.-L. (2025). Application of the Deffuant Model in Money Exchange. Communications in Mathematics and Applications, 16(4), 1159–1165. https://doi.org/10.26713/cma.v16i4.3124

Issue

Section

Research Article