Efficacy Analysis of Different Modes of Learning in Undergraduate Courses During and Post COVID-19 Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26713/cma.v16i1.2930Keywords:
Analytical Hierarchy Process, Fuzzy AHP, Triangular Fuzzy AHP, TOPSIS method, Comparison analysis, Sensitivity analysisAbstract
Prior to COVID-19, taking undergraduate courses Online was an added option. Most of the universities in Telangana offered classes in Physical mode prior to COVID-19, Online mode during COVID-19, and have been currently offering classes in Hybrid mode. The current study aims at analyzing a variety of elements from the perspectives of Online education to assess the quality as well as its effectiveness in undergraduate courses that are widely practiced in most of the colleges of Telangana State, India due to the unprecedented challenges posed by the pandemic. The present study would like to focus on the administrators of e-learning platforms, teachers, and learners. To compare the relative weights of various elements while comparing Hybrid learning, Virtual learning, and Physical learning, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach was utilized. The results of this study can also serve as the foundation for evaluating hybrid, online, and offline learning in undergraduate courses.
Downloads
References
A. Alinezhad and A. Abbas, Sensitivity Analysis of TOPSIS Technique: The results of change in the weight of one attribute on the final ranking of alternatives, Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering 7 (2011), 23 – 28.
B. J. Beatty, Hybrid-Flexible Course Design: Implementing Student-Directed Hybrid Classes, Edtechbooks, (2019), 10.59668/33.
J. M. Benítez, J. C. Martin and C. Roman, Using fuzzy number for measuring quality of service in the hotel industry, Tourism Management 28(2) (2007), 544 – 555, DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2006.04.018.
M. P. Castro and M. G. G. Zermeno, Challenge based learning: innovative pedagogy for sustainability through e-learning in higher education, Sustainability 12(10) (2020), 4063, DOI: 10.3390/su12104063.
M. T. Devi, S. Afreen, G. M. Reddy, A. Majeed and V. S. Prasad, Selection of a student for annual excellence award: An application of Trapezoidal Fuzzy AHP, Journal of Coastal Life Medicine 11(1) (2023), 981 – 988.
M. T. Devi, S. Afreen, V. S. Prasad, A. Majeed and G. M. Reddy, Application of analytic hierarchy process in engineering education, Ratio Mathematica 45 (2023), 267 – 279, DOI: 10.23755/rm.v45i0.1025.
C. Fallon and S. Brown, e-Learning Standards: A Guide to Purchasing, Developing, and Deploying Standards-Conformant E-Learning, CRC Press, USA, 272 pages (2002).
T. M. Karkar-Esperat, International graduate students’ challenges and learning experiences in online classes, Journal of International Students 8(4) (2018), 1722 – 1735, DOI: 10.32674/jis.v8i4.227.
P. J. M. van Laarhoven and W. Pedrycz, Fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11(1-3) (1983), 229 – 241, DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7.
D. J. Lee and M. S. Kim, University students’ perceptions on the practices of online learning in the COVID-19 situation and future directions, Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning 23(3) (2020), 359 – 377, DOI: 10.15702/mall.2020.23.3.359.
G. M. Mahender, S. Afreen, V. S. Prasad and A. Majeed, A computational method for normalization of Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistical Analysis 3(3) (2022), 1 – 5.
A. Meydanlioglu and F. Arikan, Effect of hybrid learning in higher education, International Journal of Information and Communication Engineering 8(5) (2014), 1292 – 1295, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1092346.
S. Naseer and S. Rafique, Moderating role of teachers’ academic support between students’ satisfaction with online learning and academic motivation in undergraduate students during COVID-19, Education Research International 2021(1) (2021), 7345579, DOI: 10.1155/2021/7345579.
G.-H. Tzeng and J. J. Huang, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Chapman and Hall/CRC, USA, 352 pages (2011)DOI: 10.1201/b11032.
R. Xu, Fuzzy least-squares priority method in the analytic hierarchy process, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 112(3) (2000), 359 – 404, DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00376-X.
Y.-K. K. Yim, Second language students’ discourse socialization in academic online communities, The Canadian Modern Language Review 67(1) (2011), 1 – 27, DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.67.1.001.
Y. C. Yoon and H. Woo, Factors in evaluating online learning in higher education in the era of a new normal derived from an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) based survey in South Korea, Sustainability 14(5) (2022), 3066, DOI: 10.3390/su14053066.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CCAL that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.



