Describing the Body Shape of Rainbow Sardine (Dussumieria Acuta) Using Landmark-Based Geometric Morphometric Analysis

Aprille Joy M. Luceño, Cesar G. Demayo

Abstract


This study utilized geometric morphometric analysis of the body shape between sexes of Dussumieria acuta. Canonical Variate Analysis (CVA) and Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA) of the relative warp scores show significant differences in the body shape between males and females. Females exhibit body shapes that are geared to support larger number of eggs as shown by the distension of their belly region and a broader body compared to the males which possess a slender body shape. Variations observed within sexes can be attributed to selection pressures present in the environment. It is concluded that landmark-based geometric morphometric analysis is a useful tool in describing variations within and between sexes of D. acuta. 


Keywords


Geometric morphometrics; multivariate methods; canonical variate; discriminant

Full Text:

PDF

References


K. Manimegalai, M. Arunachalam and R. Udayakumari, Morphometric geometric study of wing shape in Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae) from Tamil Nadu, India, Journal of Threatened Taxa 1, 5 (2009).

M.J. Cavalcanti, L.R. Monteiro and P.R.D. Lopes, Landmark-based Morphometric Analysis in Selected Species of Serranid Fishes (Perciformes: Teleostei), Zoological Studies 38, 3 (1999).

F.J. Rohlf and L.F. Marcus, “A revolution in morphometrics,” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 8, 4 (1993).

F.J. Rohlf, A. Loy and M. Corti, Morphometric Analysis of Old World Talpidae (Mammalia, Insectivora) using partial warp scores, Syst. Biol. 45 (1996).

M.E. Douglas, M.R. Douglas, J.M. Lynch and D.M. McElroy, Use of Geometric Morphometrics to Differentiate Gila (Cyprinidae) within the Upper Colorado River Basin, Copeia 2001, 2 (2001).

Z. Mamuris, P. Apostolidis, P. Panagiotaki, A.J. Theodorou and C. Triantaphyllidisdir, Morphological variation between red mullet populations in Greece, Journal of Fish biology 52, 1 (1998).

S.X. Cadrin, Advances in morphometric identification of fishery stocks, Reviews in fish Biology and Fisheries 10, 1 (2000).

A. Murta, Morphological variation of horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in the Iberian and North African Atlantic: Implications for stock identification, ICES Journal of Marine Sciences 57, 4 (2000).

S. Pakkasmaa and J. Piironen, Morphological differentiation among local trout (Salmo trutta) populations, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 72 (2001).

H. Cabral, J.F. Marques, A.L. Rego, A. Catarino, J. Figueiredo and J. Projecto-Garcia, A Genetic and morphological variation of Synaptura lusitanica Capello, 1868, along the Portuguese coast, Journal of Sea Research 50, 2-3 (2003).

F.J. Rohlf, NTSYSpc: Numerical Taxonomy System, ver. 2.20, Exeter Publishing, Setauket, NY (2008).

A.J.M. Luceño, M.A.J. Torres, S.R. Tabugo and C.G. Demayo, Describing the Body Shapes of three populations of Sardinella lemuru (Bleeker, 1853) from Mindanao Island, Philippines Using Relative Warp Analysis, Int. Res. J. Biological Sci. 3, 6 (2014).

F.J. Rohlf and D.E. Slice, Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks, Syst. Zool. 39 (1990).

O. Hammer, D.A.T. Harper and P. Ryan, PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis, Paleontologia Electronica 4, 1 (2001).

C.R. Darwin, The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, London: Murray (1871).

S.J. Casselman and A.I. Schulte-Hostedde, Reproductive roles predict sexual dimorphism in internal and external morphology of lake whitefish, Coregonus clupeaformis, Ecology of Freshwater Fish 13 (2004).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26713%2Fjims.v9i4.1022

eISSN 0975-5748; pISSN 0974-875X